This lab was a good way to get started with maps in my opinion because we got a lot of good examples of what we should and should not do when it comes time for us to make our own maps. I would say the most challenging part for this lab was verbalizing why the poor map was poorly made. The map I chose for a good map was the Easter Island map because it provided a lot of information about the island without overwhelming the audience and presented it in an appealing way.
Answer the following questions for the well-designed map: Easter
Island Map
General
▪
The purpose
of the map is to map out Easter Island and the different roads, statues, and
mountains that are on it.
▪
The affective
objective of the map is to show what is on Easter Island.
▪
The expected
audience is probably those with at least high school education.
Cartographic Design
▪
Is there
appropriate visual emphasis on important themes? Yes
▪
Is the symbology
for qualitative and quantitative data effectively applied? Yes
▪
Do the colors
and symbols support the substantive and affective objectives? Yes
▪
Are the
symbols and labels legible? Yes (a
little busy in some places but overall good)
▪
Are the
symbols intuitive and easy to decipher or do they have good explanation? Yes
▪
Is there
appropriate use of graphics, images, text blocks, or other supporting
information? Yes
Map Elements & Page layout
▪
Does the page
look balanced—are the map and map elements aligned to the page and to each
other? Yes
▪
Do all the
map elements support the substantive and affective objectives? Yes
▪
Are the map
elements placed logically on the page? Yes
▪
Does the map
have appropriate borders? Yes
▪
Scale
Is the scale (map extent) appropriate to the map? Yes
Is the scale bar appropriately designed, positioned and sized? Yes (although I would have included a white
background for it just to make it a little easier to see)
Are the scale units logical? Yes
▪
Legend
Have all the necessary symbols and details been included in the legend
as they appear on the map (size, color, etc)? Yes
Is there a logical structure related to the function of the legend? Yes
Are the legend labels logical? Yes
▪
Titles and Subtitles
Are the titles and/or subtitles present and suitably descriptive (area
mapped, subject, date, etc)? Yes
Are the
titles and/or subtitles suitably positioned and sized? Yes
Answer the following questions for the poorly-designed map: Hurricanes
Map
General
▪
What is the
purpose (substantive objective) of the map? To show the hurricanes from a
certain time period that hit North America
▪
What is the
“look and feel” (affective objective) of the map? Not sure
▪
Who is the
intended audience for the map (include expected educational level)? Not sure
Cartographic Design
▪
Is there
appropriate visual emphasis on important themes? Yes
▪
Is the symbology
for qualitative and quantitative data effectively applied? Yes
▪
Do the colors
and symbols support the substantive and affective objectives? Yes
▪
Are the
symbols and labels legible? None
▪
Are the
symbols intuitive and easy to decipher or do they have good explanation? No
▪
Is there
appropriate use of graphics, images, text blocks, or other supporting
information? No
Map Elements & Page layout
▪
Does the page
look balanced—are the map and map elements aligned to the page and to each
other? Yes
▪
Do all the
map elements support the substantive and affective objectives? Yes
▪
Are the map
elements placed logically on the page? Yes
▪
Does the map
have appropriate borders? No
▪
Scale
Is the scale (map extent) appropriate to the map? No
Is the scale bar appropriately designed, positioned and sized? None
Are the scale units logical? None
▪
Legend
Have all the necessary symbols and details been included in the legend
as they appear on the map (size, color, etc)? None
Is there a logical structure related to the function of the legend? None
Are the legend labels logical? None
▪
Titles and Subtitles
Are the titles and/or subtitles present and suitably descriptive (area
mapped, subject, date, etc)? None